The Sites remediation process contains two phases, Content Review and Accessibility Review.
Site Liaison & Project Team Responsibilities Breakdown
Content Review Phase
Goals of the Content Review
Goals of the Content Review include:
- Ensuring that content that is important to the function of the university or that is a frequent target of searches/AI questions is correct
- Ensuring that we are not doing accessibility remediation work to pages or content that ultimately don’t need to be kept
Goals of the content review do NOT include:
- Ensuring all content on every page is perfect
- Doing large content revisions or aesthetic overhauls of pages or sites
Accessibility Review Phase
Goals of the Accessibility Review
UMBC’s goal is to comply with WCAG 2.1 AA. To accomplish this, the Accessibility Review goals include the following:

- An Accessibility score of at least 90% on Silktide (keep in mind this only factors in the automated checks) with:
- No red or orange flags remaining
- No A or AA flags remaining (AAA are optional unless they are red or orange)

- A or AA assisted checks on Silktide have been either:
- Addressed and cleared
- Checked and “ignored” on Silktide as not applicable

- AAA checks on Silktide are optional (unless they are red or orange flags) but best practice, and we recommend incorporating as many as possible
- Any element that Silktide cannot evaluate for has been manually evaluated and remediated where necessary. Commonly this includes (non-exhaustive list):
- External files owned by UMBC: PDFs, Google files, Microsoft files, etc
- Media: Images, videos, audio files
- Order of headings (h1, h2, h3, etc.)